2013 & 2017 Kentucky Bar Association & Judicial Conduct Commission Complaints Submitted Against Powerful & Highly Connected Individuals!

October 2013 — I filed a Judicial Conduct Complaint against Judge Rene Williams. Judge Williams from the start, had ever intention on granting summary judgment to Brucie Moore and the Defendants.

October 18, 2013 — Steve Chandler filed a Judicial Conduct Complaint against Judge Rene Williams

October 18, 2013 — Steve Chandler filed a Kentucky Bar Association Complaint against Attorney Brucie Moore.

November 4, 2013 – Receipt Notice from the Judicial Conduct Commission that they received my Complaint.

December 16, 2013 – Judicial Conduct Commission Requested More Specific Examples.

January 2014 — Specific Examples sent to the Judicial Conduct Commission. Within this filing, I also informed the Judicial Conduct Commission, that I recently received Justice Minton’s signature stamp denial of the Motion to Recuse that I sent to the Kentucky Supreme Court.

February 17, 2014 — Judicial Conduct Commission declined to investigate further.

May 25, 2017 — Judge Rene Williams issued an Order Denying Chandler’s Motion to Recuse in the civil action case, citing to the rubber signature stamp of Retired Chief Justice Minton, Denying Chandler’s 2013, Motion to Recuse.

Judge Williams falsely alleges that she was unaware of Chandler’s Motion to Reconsider, until she checked Courtnet as she received no actual notice of it. Moreover, she completely misrepresented the content of the Motion to Reconsider, within this Order. So here is exactly how it played out, Judge Williams, a week before Chandler’s already scheduled Motion to Recuse Hearing, issued an Order on April 6, 2017, attempting circumvent, Chandler’s already scheduled Hearing on April 13, 2017. (Much like she did in October of 2013.) I directly confronted Judge Williams about the “honest service fraud” i.e. self-dealing bank fraud, that she had been signing off on, to the benefit Brucie Moore, and many others, for more than a decade. I respectfully gave her the opportunity to Reconsider her recusal.

Notice how Judge Williams Orders always refer back to the Signature Stamp Order of Former Chief Justice Minton from December 2013. I have it on good authority that Justice Minton throughout his tenure with the Kentucky Supreme Court NEVER affirmed a KRS 26A.020, Motion to Recuse. Contrary to Judge Williams assertion, the Court of Appeals did not address the complete merits concerning Judge Williams refusal to recuse within the fraudulent February 17, 2017, ORDER affirming. But that is precisely how the corruption in the Kentucky Judiciary has managed to stay unexposed, by all levels, sticking together. Why wouldn’t they, they all answered to the exact same individual. LIKE A CRIME BOSS

Hence the reason for me filing a Petition to Reconsider, because they entirely ignored the fact that Chandler did not appeal the Jury verdict, Chandler appealed the Constitutional violation of Judge Williams, striking 60% of Chandler’s purported testimony and evidence from his Will Contest Complaint. At the onset, Judge Williams set a premature two-year temporal reference, on admissible evidence, before she made Brucie Moore file an Answer to the Complaint, and most definitely before any type of discovery could be conducted.

But just so there isn’t any doubt as to JUDGE WILLIAMS OBLIGATION AND DUTY to recuse herself, even if I hadn’t filed a motion, I am going to add in the rules which speak for themselves.

DISQAULIFICATION RULES ➡️Much More on this issue within the Civil Action page.

By not recusing herself, as required by Supreme Court Rules, and basic common sense, Judge Williams denied Chandler his one and only RIGHT to an unbiased Appeal, concerning laches rulings in Mary Katherine’s case, while at the same time, protecting herself from exposure.

August 2017 — JCC COMPLAINT AGAINST JUDGE RENE WILLIAMS 5th Judicial Circuit to the Judicial Conduct Commission, which laid out the decade long scheme between Judge Williams and Attorney Brucie Moore, to defraud the citizens of Union County of Honest Service. Regarding the local State Chartered, United Community Bank of West Kentucky, I further included records from other banks in the County, where Brucie Moore only files in her capacity as County Attorney.

United Community Bank Records Redacted

Fifth Third Bank Redacted

Old National Bank

Gatekeeping Rainmaker

Followed up by two phone calls ..

December 26, 2018 — Response submitted by Sarah Coker, denying request for sworn Complaint.

January 14, 2019 — Order from the Kentucky Bar Association – that I NEVER RECEIVED.

February 3, 2019 — Letter to Sarah Coker, within Response Angie’s case, listed below: but specifically references the Chandler Complaint. As I had yet to receive, and Order stating what Chandler’s due date to respond to the Official KBA Complaint.

May 15, 2019 — Kentucky Bar Association Charges against me for my Chandler filings.

May 30, 2019 — Motion to Dismiss Count IV of the Chandler Charges specifically setting out that I NEVER received the supposed Order mailed on January 14, 2019. As that was the day my grandmother passed away, and I was out of town. Provided the KBA with a copy of my grandmother obituary.

========================================================================

THE RIDICULOUSNESS OF ANGIE’S CASE, in of itself establishes that this has always been a Kill the Messenger Scheme to Silence me!

2019 Complaint filed by Angie!

My Response to Complaint filed by Angie!

RETAINER AGREEMENT

TEXT MESSAGES THAT SPECIFICALLY REFERENCES MR. UNDERWOOD

However, when you read the Orders against me, they make it sound like Angie lost something or was injured in some kind of way through my actions or inactions. The Trial Commissioner fabricated a dispute of the $400 filing fee, to which Angie was simply being slightly combative with my attorney, during a zoom deposition.

Every single Orders ignores damn near everything, and just makes it up. Every sentence will be disputed on upcoming pages. The Trial Commissioner refused to allow me to pay for a person to privately record the two-day hearing. This forced me to use a narrator’s app, but you will be able to understand why Lisa Johnson, Trial Commissioner didn’t want the hearing recorded. I am actually surprised when my former attorney said that Andre Bergeron, was okay with me having the proceedings recorded. Especially since he is the ………………….

Angie’s Supplemental Response February 2019.

The Supplemental Response filed by Angie, the Complainant, was NEVER sent to me. This was something that was not lost on Kentucky Bar Association Andre Bergeron. On January 18, 2022, during the zoom depositions of Angie and Cindy, Andre Bergeron stated the following: ”

Kentucky Bar Association Formal Charges May 30, 2019.

My Formal Response to KBA’s Charges, discussing in detail what the KBA has to be ignoring in order to move forward with ridiculous charges.

COURTNET SHEET ESTABLISHING THAT EVEN SIX MONTHS LATER – THE CASE WAS STILL BEING STALLED BY OPPOSING DEFENSE COUNSEL.